Search across imported message history.

Clean Sweep

[FILEN #71] From Stimpy to All on 10:43 am Wed Oct 18, 1995

I was just wondering if anyone got the clean sweep to work i get to where ya have to put the serial # in and it gives me an invalid #.... Stimpy

Re: Clean Sweep

[FILEN #72] From Karatekid to Stimpy on 5:44 pm Wed Oct 18, 1995

S> I was just wondering if anyone got the clean sweep to work i get to where S> ya have to put the serial # in and it gives me an invalid #.... The S/N that comes with the files is wrong, I couldn't get that install too :-( ──═══─ KarateKid ─═══──

Re: Clean Sweep

[FILEN #81] From Shooter to Stimpy on 12:08 am Sat Oct 21, 1995

S> I was just wondering if anyone got the clean sweep to work i get to where S> ya have to put the serial # in and it gives me an invalid #.... I have a serial number but I'm not sure if it works. It's 001-16-26703.

Re: Clean Sweep

[FILEN #82] From Karatekid to Shooter on 8:54 am Sat Oct 21, 1995

S> I was just wondering if anyone got the clean sweep to work i get to where S> ya have to put the serial # in and it gives me an invalid #.... S> I have a serial number but I'm not sure if it works. It's 001-16-26703. This is the S/N that comes with the files and it won't works

Re: Clean Sweep

[FILEN #83] From Stimpy to Shooter on 12:04 pm Sat Oct 21, 1995

S> I have a serial number but I'm not sure if it works. It's 001-16-26703. That is the serial number that came with it. I have tried it already.... Thanxs Stimpy

Re: Clean Sweep

[FILEN #84] From Maxxum to Stimpy on 12:24 am Sun Oct 22, 1995

S> I have a serial number but I'm not sure if it works. It's 001-16-26703. S> S> That is the serial number that came with it. I have tried it already.... Have you tried using the # from Clean Sweep ver 1.0 ? The serial # for that one was 000-15C-72794 .... if the Windows 95 vers

Re: Clean Sweep

[FILEN #85] From Stimpy to Maxxum on 10:23 pm Sun Oct 22, 1995

M> Have you tried using the # from Clean Sweep ver 1.0 ? M> The serial # for that one was 000-15C-72794 .... if the Windows 95 version M> follows the same format, then it appears that a letter might be missing in t M> middle??? Just trying to make suggestions.... Thanxs i got th