Canonical Message
Re: Multi-tasking
Date:2:29 am Thu Nov 16, 1995
Number:#29
From:Gus
Base:Bomb_NET BBS Discussion
To:Bilbo Baggins
Subj:Re: Multi-tasking
BB> Well, I run SCO System V v3.2...It's a bare package, run-time system, BB> extended utilities and the developement system. I've also played around BB> with their Open Desktop v4 but don't have a copy as I can't afford it. BB> I've also looked at an AT&T System V version for a motorola based syst BB> but ended up going with SCO's Intel package. BB> In my experience, Unix has it's own set of problems, but multi-user BB> multi-tasking is not one of them. sounds like you know yer stuff (or at least more than the normal local user).. i only have experience with HPUX.. Hewlett Packard made a pretty good version of Unix.. i've never used it for multi-tasking though.. just for the net.. GpUcS --- GEcho 1.10+ * Origin: Laboratory X -Guelph, ON- (5i9)766.1793 (2662:519/200)
Previous Next Back to Area Open Thread
Display ANSI
BB> Well, I run SCO System V v3.2...It's a bare package, run-time system,
BB> extended utilities and the developement system. I've also played around
BB> with their Open Desktop v4 but don't have a copy as I can't afford it.
BB> I've also looked at an AT&T System V version for a motorola based syst
BB> but ended up going with SCO's Intel package.
BB> In my experience, Unix has it's own set of problems, but multi-user
BB> multi-tasking is not one of them.
sounds like you know yer stuff (or at least more than the normal local user)..
i only have experience with HPUX.. Hewlett Packard made a pretty good version
of Unix.. i've never used it for multi-tasking though.. just for the net..
GpUcS
--- GEcho 1.10+
* Origin: Laboratory X -Guelph, ON- (5i9)766.1793 (2662:519/200)