grazzt.com

Canonical Message

Re: hmm

Date:1:46 am Sat Oct 14, 1995
Number:#90
From:Temujin
Base:Bomb_NET Programs
To:Algorhythm
Subj:Re: hmm
T> I mean you basically have science on one side, and religion on the other.
T> Both defying one another.
A> Honestly, they're not. Science is an explanation of how natural phenomenon
A> happen in life. Religion is the dictation on our spiritualism and how we
A> shoudl treat others. They don't contradict each other because they aren't ev
A> talking about the same thing. Granted, all religions have explanations for t
A> original occurances...such as the creation of earth, etc etc, and science
A> undermines that. But those things are meaningless in Religion in the sense
A> that they are unimportant to how we should treat one another and ourselves.
A> Science does NOT tell us how to treat one another and that's why people try
A> escape to it. Because it's a lot easier to follow (See point above). I find
A> ironic and sad in a way when people say they don't believe in religion becau
A> of science....they are so completely different. It is only the trivial, the
A> meaningless, where science and religion contradict each other. The important
A> part of religion, how to treat other people and yourself, is still intact. A
A> last time I checked, no science text book or bunsen burner told you how to d
Early reglion was considered science, and supreme, to go against it was to be
a heretic. (Galieo for example). but since then yes religion has changed
a bit to go with the spritual side, BUT what gets me is that religion has the
ignorance and cockyness to explain things like science does however with no
FACT to base it on. SUch as death, science says "We haven't a fucking clue"
but religion has all the answers, but there is no fact, you can't prove it
until you've died yourself, can't go by 'near death experiences' because if
they knew what happened when you died they can't tell you because their dead.

But i do agree with the morals and ethics (some of them) that it does
provide, but in a way I really just have to say with religious people "Grow
up".

--- Renegade v10-05 Exp
* Origin: SiLiCoN DReaMS [519] -=- 28.8 (2662:519/110)

Previous Next Back to Area Open Thread

Display ANSI
                                                                                
T> I mean  you basically have  science on one side, and religion on the other.  
T> Both defying one another.                                                    
A> Honestly, they're not. Science is an explanation of how natural phenomenon   
A> happen in life. Religion is the dictation on our spiritualism and how we     
A> shoudl treat others. They don't contradict each other because they aren't ev 
A> talking about the same thing. Granted, all religions have explanations for t 
A> original occurances...such as the creation of earth, etc etc, and science    
A> undermines that. But those things are meaningless in Religion in the sense   
A> that they are unimportant to how we should treat one another and ourselves.  
A> Science does NOT tell us how to treat one another and that's why people try  
A> escape to it. Because it's a lot easier to follow (See point above). I find  
A> ironic and sad in a way when people say they don't believe in religion becau 
A> of science....they are so completely different. It is only the trivial, the  
A> meaningless, where science and religion contradict each other. The important 
A> part of religion, how to treat other people and yourself, is still intact. A 
A> last time I checked, no science text book or bunsen burner told you how to d 
Early reglion was considered science, and supreme, to go against it was to be   
a heretic.  (Galieo  for example).   but since then  yes religion has changed   
a bit to go with the spritual side, BUT  what gets me is that religion has the  
ignorance and cockyness to explain things like science does however with no     
FACT to base it on. SUch as death,  science says "We haven't a fucking clue"    
but religion has all the answers, but there is no fact, you can't prove it      
until you've died yourself,  can't go by 'near death experiences' because if    
they knew what happened when you died they can't tell you because their dead.   
                                                                                
But i do agree with the morals and ethics  (some of them) that it does          
provide,  but in a way I really just have to say with religious people "Grow    
up".                                                                            
                                                                                
--- Renegade v10-05 Exp                                                         
 * Origin: SiLiCoN DReaMS [519] -=- 28.8 (2662:519/110)