Re: hmm

T> Early reglion was considered science, and supreme, to go against it was to b
T> a heretic. (Galieo for example). but since then yes religion has change
Cognitive abilities at that point in time were limited since free-thinking was
dissuaded and homogenization of society was encouraged. As a result, many
people were fearful 'just because' to think of anything other than what
religion clearly stated.

T> a bit to go with the spritual side, BUT what gets me is that religion has t
T> ignorance and cockyness to explain things like science does however with no
What you may call ignorance or cockiness is what is termed as faith. That is
what most people have a problem with religion in...

See, our society is materialism based. A person is judged on what they can
buy, how many cars they have, how many women they fuck, who's got the biggest
TV etc....unfortunately 99% of society represents these mindless morons. As a
result, what you get is a contradiction with religion. People become material
based, and thus when they are asked to believe in something that isn't
tangible on this world they simply cannot since they lead their lives around
the tangible. Science is much easier for them to follow since they can touch,
feel and taste the results. They can't get the same from religion.

T> provide, but in a way I really just have to say with religious people "Grow
T> up".
I'm not quite sure what you mean by the above statement. Do you feel that
religious people are immature?

-/-<algorhythm>-\-

--- Renegade v10-31 Exp
* Origin: ·∙ THE TiMEBOMB [519] (2662:519/125)

Previous Next Back to Area Open Thread