Archive Explorer
Full-text search plus filters for base, date range, user handle, and thread chain.
Results: 15
N> * Reply to msg originally in Bn_B&S N> N> Servility blew chunks.. errr yapped about Re: 486 - Pentium N> to Bellicose on 11-16-95 15:54 ... N> B> Except in math based porgrams where the FPU of the Pentiums is superio B> or at least that's what I've been told. N> N> Se> :) And
BO> Tell me about it I have a DX 2 66 with 4 RAM it runs windows 95 like SHIT f BO> I need like $2000 just to get it running good. RAM AND VIDEO CARD that's th BO> key. HR> HR> Yeah, no kidding. I only have 4 megs of ram right now and a shitty vide HR> card. hehe But soon I'll ha
HR> Yeah, no kidding. I only have 4 megs of ram right now and a shitty vide HR> card. hehe But soon I'll have a decent computer. E> E> Believe me.. RAM is the key factor. Win95 on a 16 MB system would be E> light-years faster than on 8, no matter what the CPU. Yah, no kidding..
BB> too bad at all. But I got a Pentium 90, 8 megs ram, 2x CD-ROM w/ SB, 850 H BB> etc for 1500 .. and I mean, that's not expensive at all (plus you could BB> probably be able to get it cheaper now too!). S> you couldn't buy it individual nowadays for cheaper than that.. Ie., P-9
HR> Yeah, that's what I wuz thinking as well. I'll probably go that route. HR> Unless..... HR> .....I can find a deal like that. How'd ya get all that for $1500?? I'l HR> give ya $1000 right now for it. I don't need the m****-****a stuff. I alrea HR> have all that stupid stuff.
L> The P5's won't be CHEAP as hell. The P6's will be EXPENSIVE as hell, the P5 L> aren't gonna drop that much right away, because people won't be able to affo L> the P6, so they'll just go with a P5 still. Ok, remember when the 486 came out .. the 386 costed peanuts. Like .. the
BB> Umm.. I still think they will drop in price because new buys will still wa BB> the top of the line systems and therefore go for the P-6 .. and as a result BB> the price of the P-5 will drop .. The whole cycle repeats over and over again soon they'll find something else and i
BB> Shit .. I guess you don't realize that's without a monitor. BTW, there's t BB> store in TO that sells 486 DX4/100's .. with monitor, 4 megs ram, 540 meg H BB> umm .. 2X CD-ROM, sound card etc. for like 900$ Shit, that's a deal and a BB> half. Anyways, it's called Compu Silv o
.·∙Hood Rat Blurted this to Excalibur `∙·On 20 Nov 95 15:34:16·∙·. HR> Yeah, no kidding. I only have 4 megs of ram right now and a shitty vide HR> card. hehe But soon I'll have a decent computer. E> E> Believe me.. RAM is the key factor. Win95 on a 16 MB system would be E> light
L> The P5's won't be CHEAP as hell. The P6's will be EXPENSIVE as hell, the P5 L> aren't gonna drop that much right away, because people won't be able to affo L> the P6, so they'll just go with a P5 still. BB> BB> Ok, remember when the 486 came out .. the 386 costed peanuts. Like
E> I'm going to butt in... NO 486dx100 is FASTER than a p60, BUT if you load u E> the 486 with pci attachments, kick ass controller/video card etc..etc.. it c E> be faster than a p60 with generic parts... HR> E> HR> We're talking about a DX4/120 and a Pent 60-75. A DX4/120 kills
E> I wouldn't say kills it.. but ya, I believe that, but p60's AND p75's are E> crap anyways, they don't make 60's anymore, and p75's are rejected p100's E> (from what I hear) They are... 60 are reject 66... 90 are reject 100... 75 must be really rejected 100... 120 are reject 1
HR> Yah, no kidding.. But it didn't run badly on 4 megs with an SX/33.. it HR> wuzn't quick, but wuzn't slow.. not any slower than W3.1 wuz.. M> M> are you smoking crack? i ran it on a sx-33 and 4 megs ram...i almost turned M> by the time it loaded up! hehe it was WAY slower then
S> They are... 60 are reject 66... 90 are reject 100... 75 must be really S> rejected 100... 120 are reject 133... 150 are reject 166... and there is a 1 S> (I think) which is a rejected 200... determined by how many errors are put o S> by running it at higher speeds... so basic
S> They are... 60 are reject 66... 90 are reject 100... 75 must be really S> rejected 100... 120 are reject 133... 150 are reject 166... and there is a 1 S> (I think) which is a rejected 200... determined by how many errors are put o S> by running it at higher speeds... E> E> so