Canonical Message
Re: 486 - Pentium
Date:1:58 am Thu Nov 23, 1995
Number:#56
From:Molson
Base:Bomb_NET Buy/Sell
To:Hood Rat
Subj:Re: 486 - Pentium
.·∙Hood Rat Blurted this to Excalibur `∙·On 20 Nov 95 15:34:16·∙·. HR> Yeah, no kidding. I only have 4 megs of ram right now and a shitty vide HR> card. hehe But soon I'll have a decent computer. E> E> Believe me.. RAM is the key factor. Win95 on a 16 MB system would be E> light-years faster than on 8, no matter what the CPU. HR> HR> Yah, no kidding.. But it didn't run badly on 4 megs with an SX/33.. it HR> wuzn't quick, but wuzn't slow.. not any slower than W3.1 wuz.. are you smoking crack? i ran it on a sx-33 and 4 megs ram...i almost turned 80 by the time it loaded up! hehe it was WAY slower then 3.1.. ·Molson· --- Renegade v10-05 Exp * Origin: .·∙Psychotic illusion [5i9] (2662:519/130)
Previous Next Back to Area Open Thread
Display ANSI
.·∙Hood Rat Blurted this to Excalibur
`∙·On 20 Nov 95 15:34:16·∙·.
HR> Yeah, no kidding. I only have 4 megs of ram right now and a shitty vide
HR> card. hehe But soon I'll have a decent computer.
E>
E> Believe me.. RAM is the key factor. Win95 on a 16 MB system would be
E> light-years faster than on 8, no matter what the CPU.
HR>
HR> Yah, no kidding.. But it didn't run badly on 4 megs with an SX/33.. it
HR> wuzn't quick, but wuzn't slow.. not any slower than W3.1 wuz..
are you smoking crack? i ran it on a sx-33 and 4 megs ram...i almost turned 80
by the time it loaded up! hehe it was WAY slower then 3.1..
·Molson·
--- Renegade v10-05 Exp
* Origin: .·∙Psychotic illusion [5i9] (2662:519/130)