Canonical Message
Re: hmm
Date:8:02 pm Thu Oct 19, 1995
Number:#119
From:Algorhythm
Base:Bomb_NET Programs
To:Grandpa
Subj:Re: hmm
G> Well, I don't know if you have been keeping up with things, but atheism has G> recently been PROVEN to be wrong. And DON'T say that you can't prove a G> religion right or wrong using sound scientific techniques. I recently read G> four seperate books on the subjects, written by very prominent scientists, G> relying on scientic principles supported by the likes of Roger Penrose, and G> Stephen Hawking. God does exist. I am not an atheist, if you thought I was. I was simply stating the general consensus that most of the atheists that I have talked to state. Out of curiosity, what are the arguments that Hawking/Penrose use against atheism? I'm interested. -/-<algorhythm>-\- --- Renegade v10-31 Exp * Origin: ·∙ THE TiMEBOMB [519] (2662:519/125)
Previous Next Back to Area Open Thread
Display ANSI
G> Well, I don't know if you have been keeping up with things, but atheism has
G> recently been PROVEN to be wrong. And DON'T say that you can't prove a
G> religion right or wrong using sound scientific techniques. I recently read
G> four seperate books on the subjects, written by very prominent scientists,
G> relying on scientic principles supported by the likes of Roger Penrose, and
G> Stephen Hawking. God does exist.
I am not an atheist, if you thought I was. I was simply stating the general
consensus that most of the atheists that I have talked to state.
Out of curiosity, what are the arguments that Hawking/Penrose use against
atheism? I'm interested.
-/-<algorhythm>-\-
--- Renegade v10-31 Exp
* Origin: ·∙ THE TiMEBOMB [519] (2662:519/125)